G.A. Imports, Inc. v. Subaru Mid-America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that termination for failure to consent to an exclusivity provision is unfair where a manufacturer uses an exclusivity requirement to enhance market penetration, but cannot supply a sufficient number of vehicles
• requiring dealer to maintain a single-line Subaru dealership to increase market penetration held unreasonable when distributor was unable to supply an adequate number of vehicles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).