G-M-I

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the North Carolina offense at issue (taking indecent liberties with children) was broader than the Pennsylvania offense of indecent assault and thus, not similar for purposes of Subchapter I of SORNA based, in part, on the offenses’ different age requirements
• stating that whether an out-of-state conviction is similar under Subchapter I of SORNA to Pennsylvania’s indecent assault statute is a question of statutory interpretation for which our standard of review is de novo and our scope of review is plenary
• discussing the genesis of Subchapter I

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).