G. M. Dykes Iron Works, Inc. v. Dehenffe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the evidence seized was not subject to discovery by way of an independent source, and therefore is not purged of the taint of illegality”
• stating that, “the fact that an entry is made at night raises particular concern over its reasonableness[.]”
• recognizing but limiting application under art. I, § 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
• “Where the record supports the findings of the suppression court, we are bound by those facts and may reverse only if the court erred in reaching its legal conclusions based upon the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).