G. J. Hawaii, Ltd. v. Waipouli Development Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pre-hearing notice letter identifying the evidence necessary to substantiate a claim was not sufficient to satisfy § 3.103(c)(2)
• holding that the Board's duty to assist a claimant in developing his claim is heightened in cases in which the appellant's SMRs are lost or destroyed \and includes the obligation to search for alternate medical records\
• holding that the Board’s duty to assist a claimant in developing his claim is heightened in cases in which the appellant’s SMRs are lost or destroyed “and includes the obligation to search for alternate medical records”
• stating that when service medical records are presumed destroyed the VA’s duty to assist is heightened
• noting that Board is required to \address the credibility of appellant's sworn testimony or provide reasons for discounting that testimony\
• noting that Board is required to “address the credibility of appellant’s sworn testimony or provide reasons for discounting that testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).