G & H Associates v. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to be actionable, a claim must be timely under both the statute of repose and the applicable statute of limitations
• noting that “[statutes of limitation are procedural bars to a plaintiff’s action”
• accrual begins when the plaintiff first knew or should have known of the 10 injury
• accrual begins when the plaintiff first knew or should have 6 known of the injury
• in a 12 tort action, the limitations period does not commence “until the aggrieved party knew, or 13 reasonably should have known, of the facts giving rise to the damage or injury.”
• explaining distinction between statute of repose and statute of limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).