FWT, Inc. v. Haskin Wallace Mason Property Management, L.L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reciting rule that, when exercising a purchase option, “a new demand, proposal, condition, or modification of the terms of the offer is not an acceptance”
• “Our review of the case law leads us to conclude that, as a general rule, the holder of a preferential right cannot be compelled to purchase assets beyond the scope of the agreement subject to the preferential right in order to exercise that right.”
• “Our review of the case law leads us to conclude that, as a general rule, the holder of a preferential right cannot be compelled to purchase assets beyond the scope of the agreement subject to the preferential right in order to exercise that right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).