F.V. v. Barron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in summary judgment motion “we must view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party ... and give him the benefit of all favorable inferences in support of [his] claim” (internal quotation omitted)
• noting that in summary judgment motion \we must view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party . . . and give him the benefit of all favorable inferences in support of [his] claim\ (internal quotation omitted)
• declining to apply the doctrine where a defendant had not engaged in overt trickery or active deception that caused the plaintiff to sleep on his rights
• “When a procedural statute of limitations runs its course, only the remedy is barred, not the common law right.”
• “Procedural statutes of limitations are not construed strictly, but rather, flexibly, guided by principles to achieve a just end.”
• “courts generally do not expand the limitations period defined by a statute of repose unless the Legislature carved out exceptions that permit for tolling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).