Skip to main content
· 1/26/1951

Futhey v. Atchison,T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Citations

  • 96 F. Supp. 864
  • 27 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2415
  • 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “argument as to relevance . . . although not persuasive . . . could be characterized as a justification having ‘substan[ce],’” and therefore “an award of attorney's fees is not warranted”
  • “[A]ny protection that is afforded by the work product doctrine may be waived, and the party claiming protection has the burden of establishing that the protection has not been waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Igoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.