Skip to main content
· 7/31/2008

Futch v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 988 So. 2d 687
  • 2008 WL 2915116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the Ellison rule does not apply because it has not been shown that appellant’s affidavit directly contradicts her deposition testimony.”
  • exception to Ellison allows change or discrepancy in prior opinions if credible explanation is offered
  • “A summary judgment is appropriate only when there is not the slightest doubt as to any issue of material fact. The facts must be viewed most favorably to appellant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.