Fustok v. Banque Populaire Suisse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the need for translation of the testimony of foreign witnesses weighs in favor of dismissal
• “With Swiss legal experts in such sharp dispute as to Swiss law and the holding of Swiss high court rulings, the matter is best left to knowledgeable Swiss jurists.”
• “[P]laintiff does not offer a single compelling reason regarding his own convenience to support his choice of this forum.”
• “[P]laintiff does not offer a single compelling reason regarding his own convenience to support his choice of this forum.”
• “With Swiss legal experts in such sharp dispute as to Swiss law and the holding of Swiss high court rulings, the matter is best left to knowledgeable Swiss jurists.”
• “When fraud charges are made, it is desirable that the factfinder have the benefit of demeanor testimony of witnesses who would be available in Geneva and not the United States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).