Fuster v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding employer's knowledge that a pilot continued to wear a back brace while flying was sufficient to toll the statute of limitations
• concluding statute of limitations tolled while claimant continued to use back brace
• reversing JCC's rejection of family physician's testimony regarding PI because he was not an expert in orthopedics, was unfamiliar with the AMA Guides, and saw claimant eleven months after the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).