Fusong Jinlong Wooden Grp. Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in context nonpublic forum, an ample alternative does not need to be the most efficient one for speaker's purposes
• holding that a charity drive organized by government was nonpublic forum for private speakers to solicit donations, and therefore that viewpoint discrimination was prohibited
• holding that although the forum was the charitable drive itself, the court could consider the special nature and function of the federal workplace in evaluating limits on access
• holding that when a court determines that no protected First Amendment right is involved, it need go no further
• holding that an exclusion must be “reasonable in light of the purpose served by the forum”
• holding that when a court determines that no protected First Amendment right is involved, it need go no further

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).