· 9/29/2005
Furst v. Smith
Citations
- 176 S.W.3d 864
- 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 7942
- 2005 WL 2385545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when defendant has not answered, trial court acquires jurisdiction over that defendant solely on proof of proper service
- noting that the party requesting service has the responsibility to ensure that proper service is accomplished and that the record reflects proper service
- stating that “[l]ack of proof of proper service constitutes error on the face of the record that defeats the trial court’s jurisdiction”
- explaining that if defendant has not answered, trial court acquires jurisdiction over that defendant solely on proof of proper service
- noting that party requesting service has responsibility to ensure that proper service is accomplished and the record reflects proper service
- noting that the party requesting service has the responsibility to ensure that proper service is accomplished and that the record reflects proper service
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elsa Alcala
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.