Skip to main content
· 9/29/2005

Furst v. Smith

Citations

  • 176 S.W.3d 864
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 7942
  • 2005 WL 2385545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when defendant has not answered, trial court acquires jurisdiction over that defendant solely on proof of proper service
  • noting that the party requesting service has the responsibility to ensure that proper service is accomplished and that the record reflects proper service
  • stating that “[l]ack of proof of proper service constitutes error on the face of the record that defeats the trial court’s jurisdiction”
  • explaining that if defendant has not answered, trial court acquires jurisdiction over that defendant solely on proof of proper service
  • noting that party requesting service has responsibility to ensure that proper service is accomplished and the record reflects proper service
  • noting that the party requesting service has the responsibility to ensure that proper service is accomplished and that the record reflects proper service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elsa Alcala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.