Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• arguing that cases involving transfer of venue “provide additional insight into relevant considerations”
• explaining that “when another court is actively wrestling with the issues presented” it is “[f]ar better for the litigation to proceed in a single location” as the “possibility of inconsistent results cannot be ignored”
• observing the presence of a difficult “open question regarding subject matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).