· 6/4/1928
Furness, Withy & Co. v. Sutherland
Citations
- 26 F.2d 1004
- 58 App. D.C. 226
- 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3825
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that no trespassing signs on an adjacent field were not indicative of defendant’s intent, where a fence separated the field from the open driveway
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin, Orsdel, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.