Skip to main content
· 12/4/1998

Furman v. Shapiro

Citations

  • 721 A.2d 1125
  • 1998 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4199
  • 1998 WL 863537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding there was a question as to the seriousness of injuries that resulted in several back conditions, trouble walking or lifting heavy objections, switching from full-time to part-time employment, and persistent symptoms three years later
  • reversing summary judgment where Plaintiffs injuries prevented her from: walking more than one block at a time, working full time, and bathing her daughter
  • plaintiff reduced work status as a manicurist from full-time to part-time due to her injuries
  • serious injury issue must be decided by a jury even though plaintiff had terminated her treatment within one year of the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Lally-Green, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.