· 12/4/1998
Furman v. Shapiro
Citations
- 721 A.2d 1125
- 1998 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4199
- 1998 WL 863537
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding there was a question as to the seriousness of injuries that resulted in several back conditions, trouble walking or lifting heavy objections, switching from full-time to part-time employment, and persistent symptoms three years later
- reversing summary judgment where Plaintiffs injuries prevented her from: walking more than one block at a time, working full time, and bathing her daughter
- plaintiff reduced work status as a manicurist from full-time to part-time due to her injuries
- serious injury issue must be decided by a jury even though plaintiff had terminated her treatment within one year of the accident
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEwen, Lally-Green, Montemuro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.