Skip to main content
· 10/19/2011

Furman v. Delaware Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 30 A.3d 771
  • 2011 Del. LEXIS 558
  • 2011 WL 4963847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that on a motion to dismiss, the Court may consider documents incorporated by reference that are integral to a plaintiff’s claim
  • holding that on a motion to dismiss, the Court may consider documents incorporated by reference that are integral to a plaintiff’s claim
  • finding that trial court was required to convert a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment when the Court relied upon materials outside the pleadings
  • finding that trial court was required to convert a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment when the Court relied upon materials outside the pleadings
  • explaining that absent either of the two exceptions permitting a court to consider extrinsic materials on a motion to dismiss, in order to consider materials outside the pleadings, the Superior Court is required under Rule 12(b
  • finding that the court could not consider extrinsic material on a motion to dismiss because the extrinsic evidence was offered for its truth and was not integral to plaintiff’s claim or incorporated into the complaint by reference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.