Furlon v. Haystack Mountain Ski Area, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that our decision was “not here moved by . . . considerations of public policy” absent a “disparity in bargaining power” between the parties
• observing that our decision was “not here moved by . . . considerations of public policy” absent a “disparity in bargaining power” between the parties
• stating that indemnity clause in that case would be rendered \a nullity\ if we were to apply general rule that indemnity provisions should not protect indemnitees from their own negligence unless parties expressly state that intent in provision
• stating that indemnity clause in that case would be rendered “a nullity” if we were to apply general rule that indemnity provisions should not protect indemnitees from their own negligence unless parties expressly state that intent in provision
• acknowledging generally accepted rule that \an indemnification clause does not cover liability for the indemnitee's own negligence unless it expressly so states\
• acknowledging generally accepted rule that “an indemnification clause does not cover liability for the indemnitee’s own negligence unless it expressly so states”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).