Furline v. Morrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the jury instruction on a retaliation claim required that the “retributive motive ‘played a substantial part in the suspension decision, even though other factors also may have motivated’ the decision”
• noting that in evaluating DCHRA claim, the Court “need not pause to analyze whether [plaintiff] made out a prima facie case” because defendant “produced evidence that it suspended [plaintiff] for a legitimate, non- discriminatory reason”
• Plaintiffs presented no evidence that the Hospital refrained from terminating similarly situated younger workers.
• “Broadly speaking, to state a prima facie claim of disparate treatment discrimination, the plaintiff must establish that (1) she is a member of a protected class; (2) she suffered an adverse employment action; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).