Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the breaching party-as a \willing participant[ ]\- may not sue another for tortious interference with the contract the breaching party voluntarily breached
• holding that the breaching party–as a “willing participant[]”–may not sue another for tortious interference with the contract the breaching party voluntarily breached
• explaining that the question remains whether the actions of the employee can be “separated sensibly” from those of the employer
• stating that proper admission of tape recording requires foundation including “seven foundational elements”
• stating that jury “instructions [become] the law of the case”
• finding no causation where the plaintiff was a \willing participant[ ]\ in the breach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).