Skip to main content
· 9/8/2003

Furleigh v. Allied Group Inc.

Citations

  • 281 F. Supp. 2d 952
  • 31 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2477
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15837
  • 2003 WL 22080735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that a contractual limitations period was “difficult, if not impossible, for a claimant of ordinary facilities” to understand
  • where the accrual date is determined by federal law and not by the plan, “the next step is to apply the contractual limitations period to this accrual date”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.