Furash & Company v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court “must exercise jurisdiction absent a clear expression by Congress that it intended to separate the agency from general federal revenues.”
• holding that “what matters is whether the agency’s authorizing legislation makes clear that Congress intends for the agency ... to be separated from general federal revenues.”
• holding that the Federal Housing Finance Board is a NAFI because its authorizing legislation provides a scheme whereby any surplus is credited to assessed banks rather than the Treasury’s general fund, and any deficiency is made up by special assessments rather than appropriated funds
• holding the NAFI doctrine applicable to CDA cases
• holding the NAFI doctrine applicable to CDA cases
• Under the non-appropriation doctrine, the CFC lacks jurisdiction over an action against the United States in which congressionally appropriated funds cannot be used to pay the resulting judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).