Skip to main content

Fuqua v. Fuqua

Citations

  • 558 P.2d 801
  • 88 Wash. 2d 100
  • 1977 Wash. LEXIS 741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that while cases from otherjurisdictions have invalidated attorney liens asserted against both child support and spousal maintenance, the court’s decision was limited to child support
  • “statutory attorney’s liens may not be asserted against monies which represent payments for child support”
  • state was an interested party in dispute over distribution of child support moneys held by court clerk
  • \statutory attorney's liens may not be asserted against monies which represent payments for child support\
  • county prosecutor properly appeared for and represented the county clerk in clerk's suit seeking a lawful distribution of funds paid into the clerk's office
  • state was an interested party in dispute over distribution of child support moneys held by court clerk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter, Stafford, Rosellini, Hunter, Hamilton, Wright, Brachtenbach, Horowitz, Dolliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Fuqua v. Fuqua

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.