Fuqua v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that that an instruction to an airline to deny boarding does \not constitute dissemination of the stigmatizing information in such a way as to reach the community at large[.]\
• “Disclosures to other government agencies or to an opposing litigating party are not ‘public’ for purposes of ‘stigma plus.’” (citing Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 348–49 (1976))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).