Funke v. Life Financial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in Section 11 claims, that “[s]ince the due-diligence defense” is “not [an] element[] of the plaintiffs’ case, there is no requirement that the plaintiffs anticipate the invocation of [the] defense[] in their complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).