Fundicao Tupy S.A. And Tupy American Foundry Corporation v. The United States and Cast Iron Pipe Fittings Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the question of whether a preliminary injunction should have issued is moot after the district court’s entry of final judgment
• “[A]lthough a preliminary injunction is usually not subject to a fixed time limitation, it is ipso facto dissolved by a dismissal of the complaint or the entry of a final decree in the cause.”
• “[A]]though a preliminary injunction is usually not subject to a fixed time limitation it ‘is ipso facto dissolved by a dismissal of the complaint or the entry of a final decree in the cause.’”’
• “[A]lthough a preliminary U.S. PHILIPS v. KBC BANK N.V. 931 injunction is usually not subject to a fixed time limitation, it is ipso facto dissolved by a dismissal of the complaint or the entry of a final decree in the cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).