Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/2/1974
Funderburk v. Funderburk
Citations
- 10 Wash. App. 863
- 521 P.2d 60
- 1974 Wash. App. LEXIS 1514
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An affidavit of newly discovered evidence made by counsel is not sufficient.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-11-10· cited 42×
- In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-10-24· cited 36×
- Deeble v. AlertonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1914-09-05· cited 20×
- In Re Estate of BostonWashington Supreme Court· 1971-12-16· cited 18×
- Schwartz v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-04-22· cited 18×
- Taylor v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court· 1968-01-17· cited 13×
- Schwarzwalter v. SchwarzwalterWashington Supreme Court· 1955-08-04· cited 11×
- Cody v. HerbergerWashington Supreme Court· 1962-05-22· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.