Fund for Accurate & Informed Representation, Inc. v. Weprin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing breach of warranty claims where plaintiff did not allege that defendants sold the allegedly defective product to him, “[a]nd common sense suggests that they did not”
• applying Georgia law and stating that “a plaintiff who does not plead facts that allow the court to infer that he is in privity with the defendant or part of the statutory class of protected persons fails to state a claim for breach of an express or implied warranty”
• “[A] plaintiff who does not plead facts that allow the court to infer that he is in privity with the defendant or part of the statutory class of protected persons fails to state a claim for breach of an express or implied warranty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).