Fund Animals v. Hogan, Matthew J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding challenge to 2001 environmental assessment and the regulations based upon it moot because they \are no longer in effect\
• holding challenge to 2001 environmental assessment and the regulations based upon it moot because they “are no longer in effect”
• holding challenge to 2001 environmental assessment and the regulations based upon it moot because they “are no longer in effect”
• affirming dismissal of moot challenge to environmental assessment because future assessments could be litigated, and so claim did not evade review
• “Nothing about the language of this subsection indicates, either directly or indirectly, 11 that the Congress intended that the option of emergency listing was non-discretionary with the 12 Secretary.”
• subsequent agency action superceding purported defects in earlier action moots challenge to earlier action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).