Funck v. Haskell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• device need not be intended solely for gambling purposes to fall within the Arkansas prohibitions against gambling or gaming devices
• device need not be intended solely for gambling purposes to fall within the Arkansas prohibitions against gambling or gaming devices
• device need not be intended solely for gambling purposes to fall within the Arkansas prohibitions against gambling or gaming devices
• where loser of a game was to pay the sum or sums which the players would be jointly or severally bound to pay as the cost thereof, it is gambling
• where loser of a game was to pay the sum or sums which the players would be jointly or severally bound to pay as the cost thereof, it is gambling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).