Skip to main content
· 4/9/1981

Fumo v. Commonwealth, Insurance Department

Citations

  • 58 Pa. Commw. 392
  • 427 A.2d 1259
  • 1981 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statutory licensing standards of \good business reputation\ and \worthy of a license\ were saved from being unconstitutionally vague by regulations that specified that certain criminal convictions constituted a violation of these standards
  • holding that statutory licensing standards of “good business reputation” and “worthy of a license” were saved from being unconstitutionally vague by regulations that specified that certain criminal convictions constituted a violation of these standards
  • finding that existing regulations adequately clarified language in Insurance Department Act challenged as unconstitutionally vague
  • finding that existing regulations adequately clarified language in Insurance Department Act challenged as unconstitutionally vague
  • imprecise but not unconstitutionally vague statutory language vests insurance commissioner with broad discretion to establish precise criteria for license revocations through promulgation of regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Blatt, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.