Skip to main content
· 6/15/2009

Fumo v. City of Philadelphia

Citations

  • 972 A.2d 487
  • 601 Pa. 322
  • 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that state legislators had standing to seek judicial review of a city license issuance to the extent that it had interfered with their legislative duties
  • explaining a plaintiff has a substantial interest “if his interest surpasses that of all citizens in procuring obedience to the law”
  • “An individual can demonstrate that he has been aggrieved if he can establish that he has a substantial, direct and immediate interest in the outcome of the litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Review

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.