Skip to main content

Fulton v. Woodford

Citations

  • 545 P.2d 979
  • 26 Ariz. App. 17
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • criticizing Rova Farms but nevertheless imposing a duty to offer policy limits when \there is a high potential of claimant recovery and a high potential of [excess] damages\
  • affirming directed verdict in favor of defendant where client authorized $15,000 for settlement and opposing party would have settled for $75,000 because record was silent on number amenable to both parties
  • insurer’s duty arises only when offer within policy limits or policy limits plus amount insured will pay
  • insurer's duty arises only when offer within policy limits or policy limits plus amount insured will pay
  • insurer's reservation of rights created a conflict of interest, but dual representation of insured and insurer was proper because there was consent; thus, no malpractice or bad faith cause of action available to insured against insurer
  • insurer’s reservation of rights created a conflict of interest, but dual representation of insured and insurer was proper because there was consent; thus, no malpractice or bad faith cause of action available to insured against insurer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Haire, Eu-Bank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Fulton v. Woodford

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.