Fulton v. Walton Street Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to be considered by court in ruling on anti-SLAPP motion, it must be reasonably possible that materials submitted by parties will be ‘‘admissible at trial’’
• “To strike a complaint for failure to meet evidentiary obstacles that may be overcome at trial would not serve the SLAPP Act’s protective purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).