Fulton v. Dysart Unified School District No. 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting assertion that “the Board’s decision without personally reviewing the testimony heard by the commission violated [the plaintiff’s] due process rights,” and citing to Morgan v. U.S., 298 U.S. 468, 481 (1936
• ―The adoption, in A.R.S. § 15-543 of the limited scope of review prescribed by A.R.S. § 41-785, represents a departure from the prior law which had permitted the superior court to hear and determine matters de novo.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).