Skip to main content
· 7/30/2010

Fulton County v. T-Mobile South, LLC

Citations

  • 699 S.E.2d 802
  • 305 Ga. App. 466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing direct appeal from grant of summary judgment in tax refund action
  • direct appeal was proper because, although county attorney determined claim was not cognizable, the matter was never submitted to an administrative agency
  • letter from county attorney was not a “decision” of an administrative agency
  • “Here, those who pay the [911] charge — whether T-Mobile or its customers — receive no benefit not received by the general public, because all members of the public may access the [911] system. As such, the charge is a tax.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mlkell, Phipps, Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.