Skip to main content
· 5/25/1995

Fuls v. SAIF Corp.

Citations

  • 894 P.2d 1163
  • 321 Or. 151
  • 1995 Ore. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]his court's cases have drawn a distinction between occupational diseases and occupational injuries along the lines that occupational diseases are gradual rather than sudden in onset.\
  • “[T]his court’s cases have drawn a distinction between occupational diseases and occupational injuries along the lines that occupational diseases are gradual rather than sudden in onset.”
  • bear hug was not tortious because it was “a greeting * * * which lacked any intent on the part of the customer to bring about harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.