Fulmer v. Clark Equip. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff \did not act diligently in attempting to learn Clark Equipment's identity\ where the plaintiff knew the allegedly defective forklift was a \Clark\ model
• holding that plaintiff \did not act diligently in attempting to learn Clark Equipment's identity\ where the plaintiff knew the allegedly defective forklift was a \Clark\ model
• holding that the plaintiff did not exercise due diligence in discovering the identity of Clark Equipment Company as the manufacturer of the forklift on which he was injured because the plaintiff \admitted that before he filed his complaint he had been told that the forklift was a `Clark' model\
• holding that the plaintiff did not exercise due diligence in discovering the identity of Clark Equipment Company as the manufacturer of the forklift on which he was injured because the plaintiff “admitted that before he filed his complaint he had been told that the forklift was a ‘Clark’ model”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).