Skip to main content
· 3/19/1887

Fullwood v. Blanding

Citations

  • 26 S.C. 312
  • 2 S.E. 565
  • 1887 S.C. LEXIS 77

Syllabus

<p>1. Parol testimony is admissible to show that an. assignment in writing of a bond and mortgage was intended only to secure the assignee from the payment of a debt, then in suit, which might be made a charge upon a tract of land that day purchased by the assignee from the assignor. Such testimony is inadmissible to contradict, alter, or vary the terms of a written instrument, but may be introduced to explain their object and intent.</p> <p>2. Findings of fact by the Circuit Judge, upon written testimony submitted to him, approved.</p>

Judges: Simpson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.