Skip to main content

Fuller v. State

Citations

  • 669 So. 2d 273
  • 1996 WL 26184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion in finding a child competent to testify where the child's statements regarding truth-telling were conclusory, and where the court's examination of the child's ability to observe and recollect facts was incomplete
  • holding that responses to questions concerning understanding of the importance of telling the truth must reflect a moral sense of obligation to tell the truth and that mere conclusory answers to leading questions do not satisfy this standard
  • holding that responses to questions concerning understanding of the importance of telling the truth must reflect a moral sense of obligation to tell the truth and that mere conclusory answers to leading questions do not satisfy this standard
  • “Before finding a child competent to testify, the trial court should consider (1) whether the child is capable of observing and recollecting facts, (2) whether the child is capable of narrating those facts to the court or to a jury, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.