Skip to main content

Fuller v. Fuller

Citations

  • 621 S.E.2d 419
  • 279 Ga. 805
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3195
  • 2005 Ga. LEXIS 714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no due-process violations in the preparation of a divorce judgment by an attorney for a party following ex parte communications, but disapproving of the practice
  • affirming the trial court’s order because “even if [the judge’s] communications [with the plaintiff’s counsel] were prohibited due to their ex parte nature, they did not harm [the defendant]”
  • trial court in post-divorce contempt action was authorized to set off funds converted by former spouse
  • “Even when a trial court adopts a proposed order verbatim, the findings of fact therein are those of the court and may be reversed only if they are clearly erroneous.”
  • “Even when a trial court adopts a proposed order verbatim, the findings of fact therein are those of the court and may be reversed only if they are clearly erroneous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.