Fuller v. Fend-All Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “the focus should be placed on the product itself and not the availability of any additional safety devices”
• reversing summary judgment in favor of defendant in a products liability action in part because whether the plaintiff truly appreciated the risk posed by the product was not above dispute
• reversing trial court's summary judgment order on behalf of a safety glasses manufacturer where a worker who was injured while wearing the glasses claimed that the glasses were unreasonably dangerous because they lacked a \safety side shield\ design feature
• reversing trial court’s summary judgment order on behalf of a safety glasses manufacturer where a worker who was injured while wearing the glasses claimed that the glasses were unreasonably dangerous because they lacked a “safety side shield [ ]” design feature
• summary judgment is improper where the obviousness of the danger is disputed in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).