· 1/29/1986
Fuller Company v. Ramon I. Gil, Inc.
Citations
- 782 F.2d 306
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21507
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that Colorado River created a fourth category of abstention beyond the \three traditional branches\
- considering the vexatious or contrived nature of the federal claim as part of the Colorado River analysis
- applying the Colorado River factors in the declaratory judgment context; affirming the district court’s dismissal, in part due to displeasure at the practice of filing a federal action in reaction to an adverse ruling in the state court
- describing the Colorado River doctrine as “a fourth category of abstention”
- “Colorado River created a fourth category of abstention . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Bownes, Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.