Skip to main content
· 1/29/1986

Fuller Company v. Ramon I. Gil, Inc.

Citations

  • 782 F.2d 306
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that Colorado River created a fourth category of abstention beyond the \three traditional branches\
  • considering the vexatious or contrived nature of the federal claim as part of the Colorado River analysis
  • applying the Colorado River factors in the declaratory judgment context; affirming the district court’s dismissal, in part due to displeasure at the practice of filing a federal action in reaction to an adverse ruling in the state court
  • describing the Colorado River doctrine as “a fourth category of abstention”
  • “Colorado River created a fourth category of abstention . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Bownes, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.