Fullenlove v. Vaughn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting a motion to dismiss where plaintiffs failed to plead “which specific fraudulent statements were made to them, by whom, or where and when they were made” in a claim that defendants fraudulently induced plaintiffs to enter into a contract
• granting a motion to dismiss where plaintiffs failed to plead “which specific fraudulent statements were made to them, by whom, or where and when they were made” in a claim that defendants fraudulently induced plaintiffs to enter into a contract
• recovery of insurance premiums paid when plaintiffs should have been receiving healthcare coverage allowed on a breach of contract claim
• “Where a plaintiff seeks recovery for the same damages under different legal theories, only a single recovery is allowed.”
• “Where a plaintiff seeks recovery for the same damages under different legal theories, only a single recovery is allowed.” (quoting Conway v. Icahn & Co., 16 F.3d 504, 511 (2d Cir.1994))
• “[S]ome Defendants began telling . . . members and health care providers seeking payment that the FleetCare Plan was self-funded, knowing that such statements were incorrect and misleading . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).