Fulgenzi v. Wyeth, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Buckman did not apply to plaintiffs “multiple state law tort claims, including several claims sounding in fraud”
• finding no preemption where the plaintiffs fraud claims arose under state law and did not exist solely by virtue of federal drug regulations
• finding no preemption, even if the claims alleged that the defendants violated federal drug regulations because the claims sounded in state tort law and would exist even without federal regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).