Fulford v. Universal Air Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a conviction under § 3802(d)(1) does not require that a driver be impaired, only that a driver has any amount of a specifically enumerated controlled substance in his blood
• \That appellant exercised poor judgment ... does not equate to recklessness.\
• evidence was sufficient to prove DUI under Section 3802(d)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).