Skip to main content
· 9/11/2000

Fulbright v. Apfel

Citations

  • 114 F. Supp. 2d 465
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16588
  • 2000 WL 1434782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the removal of 9.09 and subsequent revision to the other listings applied to a pending claim filed before October 25, 1999

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.