Fukuhara v. Dames & Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prematurely filed EAJA application \was not untimely . . . because the appeal period had not run\
• holding that prematurely filed EAJA application “was not untimely ... because the appeal period had not run”
• recognizing that, when analyzing substantial justification, “the evolution of VA benefits law since the creation of this Court [ ] has often resulted in new, different, or more stringent requirements for adjudication”
• holding that substantial-justification query is one of reasonableness \in law and fact\
• holding that substantial-justification query is one of reasonableness “in law and fact”
• indicating that speed and cooperation in resolving matter is one factor by which to measure reasonableness of VA’s litigation position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).