Fujitsu Limited v. Netgear Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that a user “can turn off the infringing features” does not mean there are substantial noninfringing uses
• holding, on appeal from a summary judgment decision, that a district court may rely on an industry standard in analyzing Case: 19-2215 Document: 69 Page: 3 Filed: 08/04/2020 GODO KAISHA v. TCL COMMC’N TECH. 3 infringement
• finding message fragmentation feature of wireless access point devices separate and distinct from other features of those devices
• rejecting a broad construction that “ignores the power saving purpose of the invention and is not supported by the specification.”
• describing the elements of a cause of action for contributory infringement to include “the component has no substantial noninfringing uses”
• treating “‘separate and distinct’ features . . . separately in analyzing contributory infringement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).