Fujimoto v. Western Pioneer Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing whether a contract was 2 still in force without considering the causation and damages elements of a breach of contract 3 claim
• evaluating declaratory relief arising from breach of contract without considering causation or damages
• because the insurer “offered to renew the policy for an additional six-month period 24 commencing June 21, 1976, upon receipt of the required premium before that date,” the plaintiff’s 25 late payment was not an effective acceptance
• because the insurer “offered to renew the policy for an additional six-month period 22 commencing June 21, 1976, upon receipt of the required premium before that date,” the plaintiff’s 23 late payment was not an effective acceptance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).